In
my opinion if the interviewees come from a lower standard than India they might
not feel comfortable. There are three reasons. At first, some people undergo
discrimination when they have been countries, which have better economy
situation. It’s like ignorance, and they hard to dispute others who ignored
them. Of course expatriates might face hostility, not hospitality. Second, if
interviewees live in a lower standard than India’s they can’t enjoy themselves
for their financial problem. Some of the interviews are a teacher who teaches
students to talk their own language. If they are a poor national people Indian
might not learn expatriates’ native language.
If they can’t get a job in India their life is not satisfied. The last
reason is that their work atmosphere maybe different from their countries. Interviewees
feel comfortable because India’s work environment. But if they have not been abundance
country they might not adapt new environment. If they are suffered from poor,
they can’t concentrate their new culture. In conclude, if expatriates don’t
have a nationality background like now, they may not enjoy their life in India.
This is a well-written and developed paragraph. It also has a clear organizational pattern. However, the interviewees come from a HIGHER standard of living, not a lower one as described in your paragraph. Therefore, I think your ideas might be a little different.
ReplyDelete