Social Media Survey

                  This report is based on recently researcher used face-to-face method on June 3, 2015 among a classmates sample of 8 in10 people asked about the social media. They were requested some answers about usually using app and websites, frequency, and reasons. Most of classmates answered that they usually use Facebook, Instagram. Japanese students also use Line to chat their friend. Chinese students tend to use Wechat. One of them is Korean; she replied that many Korean usually use Kakaotalk by messenger. All of them use social media at least once a day. The main reason to use social media is that they want to establish and maintain relationship with their friends and family. In addition, some students who use Instagram stated that they post their daily life and activities, and find some interesting things.

Social Networking Sites and Teens Annotated Bibliographies

Lenhart, Anada, and Madden, Mary(January 3, 2007). Social Networking Websites and Teens : An Overview. Pew Research Center Publications. Report.

 

According to a national survey of teenagers conducted by the Pew Internet & American Life Project they find American youth age teenagers usually use online social networking sites. They have some special features. Over half of them don't want to expose their profile except allowed people. Almost them usually want to limited people. Also, they usually use online social networking at least one time every day. However, Older teens show different aspects; they show almost opposite to youth age teenagers. In addition, Teens say social networking sites help them to connect with their friend. They sometimes use that to flirt to other teens.

 

This report was made in January 7, 2007, and this used currently data. In addition, this was based on a survey from Pew Internet & American Life Project. This is fact-based information because researcher used telephone from October 23 through November 19, 2006, among a national sample of 935 youths ages 12-17 asked about the ways that teenagers use these sites and their reasons for doing so. This article was designed to inform, and it used survey data and number it is objective and proving.

 

Annotated Bibliographies

Annotated Bibliographies

 

Creaney, Leon. Savulescu, Julian. and Vondy Anna(October 22, 2013). Should athletes be allowed to use performance enhancing drugs?. BMJ online. Retrieved May 27, 2015.

This article shows us the both sides of PEDs, which are pros and cons. Savulescu argues that rather than anning performance enhancing drugs we should regulate their use, but Creaney and Vandy state that would lead to increasing use and call for tougher enforcement. Savulescu argues that three good points of using PEDs, which are improving athletes abilities, improving safety, and allowing a substance safer. However, Creaney and Vondy have a counter arguments, which are that it might be escalating problems, making engineered athletes, and working by bans.

We can trust this article. First, it is a current article; it updated on October, 2013. Authors are experts for health, and there is an e-mail address. We can answer what we wonder. They get their information from publications and web. At the last page of this article it has references. This article is designed to persuade. It has objective information.

I can understand both opinions which are related about using PEDs. Sources are useful, so I can use that information to support my opinion.    

professional athletes should be allowed to use performance-enhanciong drugs?

While some people claim that it is not true all PEDs have bad effects, so they state PEDs should be allowed as long as they are monitored. However, in my opinion, it should be banned. There are two reasons. First, athletes have to compete fairly. As Catlin(2012) states, "Just as all athletes must begin at the same starting line, they must also abide by the rules about what drugs they use." The next reason is that it is bad for athletes’ heath. According to using PEDs they might be suffered from some diseases which cause to PEDs. Goodman mentions, "As I have listened to fighters discussing their performance-enhancing drug use, along with their accompanying heart, kidney, liver, bone, brain and psychiatric ailments." Because of those reason it should be banned for athletes and their competitors.




References

Catlin, Don(August 7,2012). Testing Levels the Playing Rield. The New York Times. Web.

Goodman, Margeret(August 8,2012). Clean Competition Is Satest. The New York Times. Web.
   

Is the man crazy?

I think he isn't crazy.
Because when the police and the psychiatrist cmae to his house he said he didn't see the unicorn. If he is really crazy he might say that he saw a unicorn.

Is Cellphone Etiquette Dead?

Is Cellphone Etiquette Dead?

 

1. Many people don’t know how rude it is to use cellphone in the public situation.

2. She is down on using cellphones when she is with other people.(para1.)

3. Smartphone have made people even more detached.

4. They made some rules like discount, add charge, and banned cellphones.

5.Taking a phone call and focusing on the phone's screen are usually bad etiquettes. If you really have to use cellphone you should apologize and excuse to others.

6. Someone doesn't know that to turn on the cellphone is an impolite behavior even though they have a higher position. 

7. She wants to say we can turn off our phones if we try to leave our cellphones. 

8.

Ⅰ Karen had a bad experience about using cellphone when she talked to her friend

Ⅱ According to the recent study, smartphones are caused by detachment among people. 

Ⅲ In some businesses they have alternatives to turn off cellphones.

Ⅳ Some people think it is okay to send text, but it is also a rude behavior.

Ⅴ Sometimes to use cellphones is a part of argument.

Ⅵ She wants her friend to know it is a impolite behavior to use cellphone when she talks to others.

Ⅶ She gives an example about a woman who leave from her cellphone.

 

response

In my opinion if the interviewees come from a lower standard than India they might not feel comfortable. There are three reasons. At first, some people undergo discrimination when they have been countries, which have better economy situation. It’s like ignorance, and they hard to dispute others who ignored them. Of course expatriates might face hostility, not hospitality. Second, if interviewees live in a lower standard than India’s they can’t enjoy themselves for their financial problem. Some of the interviews are a teacher who teaches students to talk their own language. If they are a poor national people Indian might not learn expatriates’ native language.  If they can’t get a job in India their life is not satisfied. The last reason is that their work atmosphere maybe different from their countries. Interviewees feel comfortable because India’s work environment. But if they have not been abundance country they might not adapt new environment. If they are suffered from poor, they can’t concentrate their new culture. In conclude, if expatriates don’t have a nationality background like now, they may not enjoy their life in India.