Annotated
Bibliographies
Creaney, Leon.
Savulescu, Julian. and Vondy Anna(October 22, 2013). Should athletes be allowed
to use performance enhancing drugs?. BMJ online. Retrieved May 27, 2015.
This
article shows us the both sides of PEDs, which are pros and cons. Savulescu
argues that rather than anning performance enhancing drugs we should regulate
their use, but Creaney and Vandy state that would lead to increasing use and
call for tougher enforcement. Savulescu argues that three good points of using
PEDs, which are improving athletes abilities, improving safety, and allowing a
substance safer. However, Creaney and Vondy have a counter arguments, which are
that it might be escalating problems, making engineered athletes, and working
by bans.
We
can trust this article. First, it is a current article; it updated on October,
2013. Authors are experts for health, and there is an e-mail address. We can
answer what we wonder. They get their information from publications and web. At
the last page of this article it has references. This article is designed to
persuade. It has objective information.
I
can understand both opinions which are related about using PEDs. Sources are
useful, so I can use that information to support my opinion.
Good work but try to be more specific in the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs. For example, what are the authors' jobs and what "publications" are used. In the 3rd paragraph identify exactly how the information (and what information) will support your argument.
ReplyDelete